Guide · June 2026 · 9 min read
How to make a photography site in 2026.
Your portfolio has one job: make a stranger want to see more of your work, or want to hire you. Most photography sites in 2026 fail at this because they're built like SaaS landing pages — loud, framework-heavy, full of motion. The good ones are quiet, fast, and let the photographs do the talking. Here's how to make one of the good ones.
What's actually changed since 2024
Three things are different now from when most photographer-site guides were written:
- Most clients view your portfolio on a phone. Around 70% of portfolio traffic is mobile. Galleries built for desktop with hover effects are now invisible to most viewers.
- AI-driven builders exist. You don't need to learn Webflow or fight a visual editor anymore. You describe what you want and the code gets written. The good ones produce real HTML/CSS, not a proprietary runtime.
- Pay-once is back. The "subscription forever" model that took over from 2015–2023 is being undercut by tools that charge once and let you walk away. Photographers — who edit a portfolio four times a year — are exactly the wrong customer for a $400/yr subscription.
The five things a photography site actually needs
Skip the rest. These are the only sections that move the needle:
-
A first impression.
One image that tells the viewer in two seconds what you shoot and how you shoot it. Your strongest frame, full-width, no caption needed. Optionally your name and one line of role ("wedding photographer, Lisbon").
-
The work.
12–30 of your best frames. Not "everything good you ever shot" — your top 30. Choose for variety (range matters), not chronology. Mobile users will scroll three of them before deciding whether to keep going.
-
A short about.
Three sentences. Who you are. What you shoot. Where you're based. Don't write a manifesto — clients are scanning to decide if you're real and reachable. If you've shot for somebody whose name they'd recognize, drop it here.
-
A way to hire you.
Email is fine. A short contact form is better. A "book a call" link is best if you actually want bookings. Whatever it is, put it at the bottom of the work, in the about, and in the footer. Three chances to act on a single scroll.
-
A committed visual identity.
One typeface family, one accent color, generous whitespace. The site itself should not compete with the photographs. Most photographer sites in 2026 still fail this — they're trying to be designed sites, when they should be designed around the photographs.
Gallery layouts: pick one.
Four layout shapes cover 95% of photographer sites. Mixing them looks confused; pick one and commit.
Grid.
Equal cells, 2-3 wide on mobile, 3-4 on desktop. Looks like a contact sheet. Best when your work has consistent framing — fashion, portrait, product. Boring when your work is varied.
Masonry.
Variable heights, fixed column widths. Looks like a Pinterest board. Best for mixed orientations — landscape + portrait + square together without weird whitespace.
Single column.
One photo per row, full width. The most editorial choice. Each frame gets full attention. Best for cinematic work — landscape, fine art, documentary. Worst for showing range quickly.
Slideshow.
One frame at a time with prev/next. Forces a curated order. Best when you want to control the narrative — series, story-driven work. Worst on mobile if you don't autoplay; clients won't tap through.
If you're stuck, start with masonry. It's the most forgiving when your work is varied.
Five design directions for a photographer's site.
Same five sections (hero, work, about, contact, footer) — five different "feels." Pick the one that matches your work, not your taste in interior design.
Editorial / cream paper.
Warm cream background, serif headings, generous reading width. Reads like a magazine feature. Best for portrait, wedding, lifestyle, anything where the work has narrative weight.
Magazine.
Display-size serif headlines, dramatic scale contrast, photography-led. Best for fashion, beauty, editorial. Read as ambitious.
Minimal modernist.
Lots of whitespace, single accent color, thin sans-serif, no decoration. The site disappears so the work doesn't compete. Best for commercial, architectural, product, anyone whose clients are agencies.
Dark mono.
Black background, monospace accents, photographs glow. Best for concert, club, street-at-night work. The contrast makes color images sing; the typography signals "this is the work of a specialist."
Where to actually build it.
The honest landscape, briefly:
- Squarespace is the default. Templates look good. $192–$432/yr forever. Compared honestly here.
- Wix is a drag-and-drop editor with a giant app marketplace. $192/yr+ depending on plan. Compared here.
- Format is photographer-specific, similar pricing tier to Squarespace. Galleries are strong.
- Pixieset is the right choice if your job is client-delivery (proofing, selling). It's not really a public portfolio tool.
- Adobe Portfolio is free with Creative Cloud. Limited template selection.
- kwaku — the one you're reading. Chat with an AI designer, get a real site, pay $30 once.
For most working photographers, the choice comes down to whether you want a recurring bill (Squarespace / Format / Adobe via the CC plan you're already paying) or a one-time payment (kwaku, or build it yourself in raw HTML).
How to make one with kwaku, in three steps.
Step 1
Describe it.
"Editorial photography portfolio, name is Mira Kane, Lisbon-based, mix of portrait and landscape, warm cream palette." That's a fine brief.
Step 2
Drag in your photos.
Attach photos in the chat. The editor places them into the gallery layout and uses one as the hero. Iterate on the layout in conversation ("make the work section masonry, three columns").
Step 3
Point your domain.
If you already own a domain, paste it in the dashboard and add the A record kwaku gives you. TLS issues automatically. Live in ~5 minutes.
Common mistakes to skip.
- Putting your full archive on the site. Twelve great frames beat sixty mixed ones. Edit ruthlessly.
- Hover effects that hide the photo. If a mouse-hover is what reveals your image's caption or filter, mobile users see nothing happen. Hide nothing.
- Auto-playing carousels. They don't increase engagement; they just stop people from controlling what they look at. Static grid, scroll-controlled.
- Music on page load. Don't.
- Three different typefaces. One for headings, one for body, that's it. The work brings the visual variety; the layout should not.
- "Coming soon" placeholders. Ship the four sections that work today. Add the fifth when you actually have something for it.